Post by Becoming Educated on Oct 12, 2014 2:26:01 GMT -8
insert quote here
insert code hereThis is one of 11 mummified heads
repatriated to New Zealand in 1998 by Minister of Maori Affairs, Tau Henare. Is
this the head that a British Museum was reluctant to include, as they felt it
was European and should remain with Europeans? The Maori warriors sold these
heads to whalers about 200 years ago and the individual was born about the time
of Captain James Cook's second exploratory voyage to New Zealand. The light
complexion, reddish hair and facial contours suggest a person of European
descent. These people, who were once numerous, were referred to, by Maori, as
"kiri-puwhero" (light complexioned skin) with hair that was
"uru-kehu" (reddish, golden tinged).
In all categories of DNA, hair coloration and
physical characteristics of the hair fibres (pigmentation channels), skull form
(craineology), etc., these specimens are a valuable resource for determining
pre-colonial ethnicities resident in New Zealand. I sincerely hope that
overseas scientists will do the tests on the 1000 or so heads that are still
outside of the controlling confines of New Zealand. There is no hope of any
such testing being done in New Zealand and, even if it was, I'd be very
suspicious of any results released to the public. I'd have to go through my
records to find references to sites in the southern belt of the North Island.
By reading descriptions of typical landmarker structures, as described in my
website, you'd assuredly locate sites yourself with relative ease. The best
approach is to get a map and see where archaeological sites are marked. In most
cases a site marked as an old, historically obscure, Maori PA, featuring cut
terraces and laboriously sculptured terrain, will predate Maori and be a
remnant structure that is, quite probably, thousands of years old. In the
surrounding hills or valley flats adjacent to the PA, look for individual
boulders that appear to have been hauled in to the area and placed to serve
some purpose. Also look for cairn heaps, serving a landmarking purpose. Look
for small pit depressions (sighting pits) from which there is a good view to
distant features (especially prominent mountains or high hills in the
vicinity). These local structures will relate to astronomy (primarily equinox
and solstice sunrises and sunsets) or overland mapping and the encoding of specialised
geometric principles into the landscape. Distances and angles between cairns or
former standing stone markers within a valley will relate to "old
world" navigation or cyclic astronomy for calendar determinations. Look
also for strange little mounds that sit on the crests of elongated hill ranges,
which stick up like pimples. These are "tor mounds" and were used for
overland mapping...as visually conspicuous alignment markers, seen for vast
distances overland. Good hunting! Martin.
From: Hemi Date:
Wednesday, 1 October 2003 22:56
Subject: Your banana.
Martin you white racist, Hemi here, direct descendant of Nga Puhi
chief, would you please explain the following contradictions in your
statements. Quotations from your writtings are underlined, the first paragraph
here contradicts the second and third paragraph. "There yet remain
many such ancient skeletons in remote burial caves, but on-one is allowed to do
a proper scientific evaluation of them and no modern-day professionals will
overtly proffer commentary related to such finds..."career suicide!"
" SEE: www.celticnz.co.nz/hot_mail.html (about the 12th paragraph
from the end of the article - or use the 'find on this page' feature of
Internet Explorer, MS web browser, in the Edit menu.) "The short
answer as to why there is suppression of true archaeological and historical
evidence in New Zealand appears to be due, in part, to the ambitions of big
business and the multinationals. Using "indigenous rights"
legislation as leverage, large parcels of New Zealand natural resources and
wealth are wrestled out of the hands of the New Zealand populace. They then
fall into the hands of a small number of corrupt, so-called,
"indigenous" leaders/ representatives, who turn around and sell
"exploitation rights" to big business. " "Privately
owned farms and large tracts of land are being gobbled up by the "Waitangi
Tribunal" and big business is the final beneficiary. Our corrupt
politicians are little more than an executive arm to the multinationals and
take their orders from the World Bank." SEE: www.viewzone.com/oklahoma.southend.html
(5th and 3rd paragraph from the end of that article). Martin (what a white
name), would you also explain and name the indigenous leaders you talk about
and name just one instance of so-called exploitation rights having been sold by
them, and then explain how in that example archeological evidence was
suppressed as you claim. Martin, why don't you explain to the readers about
the Treaty of Waitangi, so they can know what the real background is all
about. In truth, suppression of this type of archeological evidence appears to
be a world wide phenomenon/problem (see: Lisa's story at the bottom of
www.viewzone.com/oklahoma.southend.html where your article and link
lays, or should that be lies?), and I just don't think that despite being the
only so-called indigenous peoples (a very white term) world wide to have
managed to force the colonists into signing such a treaty, the Maori influence
does not (as yet) extend to world wide suppression of such evidence nor to
infiltration and control of the FBI etc. (Eh, what?
Hemi...you've lost me here...I don't know what the "Sam Hill" you're
talking about... Martin). Come on Martin, admit it, you are just
another part of the culture problem in NZ. If you could get rid of that aspect
of your character (not that you have much) then I would be an admirer, instead
I am forced to defend my children's children against your psychological tyranny. Incidentally,
my mother was full blooded Maori, despite living in the time when it was begun
to be claimed according to the white man there was no such person as that, that
myth continues today and, my son has red hair. So na na banana, stick it up
your karma (sorry just acting as stupid as you white folks claimed us Maori
were). Ka kite HEMI.
Hi Hemi, When I was very young, my well
intentioned, but devoutly religious father might as well have taken me on his
knee and said outwardly and blatantly, 'Son, there's a big, wide exciting
world out there, full of adventures, absorbing information and scientific
pursuits, sufficient to keep you happy and stimulated for a lifetime…but none
of that is for you, son, because I've got a completely different course mapped
out. I'm going to cram so much meaningless, backwards religion into your
impressionable little mind, that it'll take you years to swim free of the
brainwashing and disinformation'. If there's any one lesson that I learnt
from the course charted for me in life by my overly zealous father, it's that
things are not always what they seem. There are all manner of ulterior motives
out there in the big wide world and "truth" is a very rare, precious
and elusive commodity. We're all living in a never-ending
"infomercial", designed to turn us into mindless, compliant zombies. So,
at what level of understanding are you traipsing your course in life Hemi? Are
you seeing only what's on the surface or are you peeling back the layers to see
what's underneath? Who's manufacturing the information that you're being force
fed… the stuff that constitutes your belief system and view of the world…and
why do you believe what you believe? The Treaty of Waitangi is a very
fine, outstanding document, written in an 1840's historical context, and is as
applicable today as it was then. It was fashioned for the protection and
well-being of all New Zealanders, but
self-serving liars and traitors in Maoridom, aided and abetted by (oftimes)
fat-cat white lawyers or other opportunists who spurn them on, are twisting,
distorting or outrightly deleting its simple clauses, such that New Zealand is
open for plunder. Did you know that the defining Preamble has been
dropped, along with Articles 1 & 3? The 2nd Article has been
so twisted and deliberately misinterpreted as to render it unrecognisable.
Also, a fraudulent English text is being used, based on a 3rd of
February, 1840 rough draft, when, in fact, that version was replaced by a 4th
of February final English draft. The true English text says the same as the
Maori text, whereas the false English text is nothing like the Maori text, but
is the version that self-serving liars and control-freaks wish to push and
promote so that they can "rip off" New Zealand. To read all about
Hobson's true, final English draft and to view photos of it, go to:
www.celticnz.co.nz/The%20Littlewood%20Treaty.htm
or: www.treatyofwaitangi.net.nz The activists who are constantly referring
verbally to the Treaty of Waitangi don't ever use it's clauses and articles.
What they use is "The Five Legal Principles", which have
absolutely nothing to do with the Treaty, but were put in place expressly to plunder
New Zealand. Martin.
From G anja Date:
6th of February, 04.. hi , i
recentley found a flyer on my vehicle regarding the "littlewood
treaty" , if you ever place another such pice of crap on my car again il
break your face and both your kneecaps , understand? marty vroegop p.s
"NICE TRY , DAIL 018 AND ASK FOR SOME - ONE WHO CARES " THANKYOU
Hi Ganja, I've never produced a
"flyer" about the Littlewood Treaty or even heard of one being in
existence, but it's nice to know someone's so passionate about the true Treaty
of Waitangi text that they're spreading the word. Thanks for informing me. Hope
you can get professional help...you're obviously a certifiable sicko. Martin.
From: Anthony Date:
Sunday, 13 June 2004 7:01 p.m.
To Mr M. Doutre, Sir, I am
older than you and, even worse, I lived and worked in Africa. I am “ A Colonial
“— and after 50 years I still feel tears arising as I see what is happening to
those who I grew to care for. Worse still:- I am a retired priest who was
ordained to be colour blind and see only individual human beings. I can’t find
words strong enough to convey the fullness of my appreciation for your web
page. The depth and balance is mind boggling. Thank you so much and also to
those who have responded. It is a privilege to be able to share in their
research, scholarship and knowledge. Equally so to those of shallower
understanding, for their contributions help one to ‘keep ones feet on the
ground’. It mystifies me that Truth and Fact can be so rejected. If we all, as
a country, understood, acknowledged and were taught the truth of our past how
different today would be. There would be no racism, no ‘chip-on-the-shoulder’
and The Treaty would be irrelevant, an incident in our evolution as world
citizens where race/ ethnicity/ language would be regarded as a mere accident
of birth in an imperfect world to be overcome as we strove top create a happy
future. Your site is a small step in that direction . Again, my thanks and
appreciation. Anthony.
Hi Anthony,
Many thanks for your encouraging comments. It is my hope that this website provides
an "all-too-rare" arena where we can "mention the unmentionables", keep the old
regional stories and oral traditions alive (despite the organised programme to
kill them off) and explore new bodies of compelling evidence. There are huge
chasms that divide us unnecessarily and we need forums of open discussion,
where we can dissect and analyse historical and archaeological issues honestly.
Recently, you'll remember, we were subjected to a carefully orchestrated piece
of TV propaganda called "State Of The Nation", which most New
Zealanders agree was a dismal failure and media con job. We'd been led to
believe that we were going to have a "no holds barred, vent your
spleen, knock down-drag-out" debate, where we could get a whole lot of
issues off our chests. Instead, within minutes of the programme opening, it was
evident we'd all been conned once again, especially when the carefully
contrived, grievance industry pseudo-history imfomercials started up. Virtually
every statement made in these utterly unwarranted, "set the
stage", NZ plastic history-clips was a huge distortion or outright
barrage of lies about the true events of our colonial history. I was especially
appalled by the way the history of Taranaki was misrepresented and how Wiremu
Kingi, the lout who started the Taranaki wars, was "Deified",
almost to the point of "Sainthood". Maybe someone should have
read what other contemporary paramount chiefs of New Zealand said about Kingi
at the Kohimarama Conference, initiated by Governor Gore Browne, who was
seeking their counsel. Many people immediately switched channels to avoid the
two hour torture session of "everything's wonderful in the garden"
PR clap-trap and drudgery. One Aucklander summed it up perfectly in his letter
to "Scoop": The "State of the Nation" live debate
on New Zealands race relations status was beyond disappointing. The programme
producers lofty goal of having a "long overdue" discussion was not
realised - just tired old rhetoric and politically correct platitudes espoused
by the vocal minority. What was revealed was the level to which the New
Zealand public (particularly Pakeha apologists) have allowed themselves to be
indoctrinated with lies about our land and our history. Supposed
"Principles" of the Treaty? "Taonga" meaning
"treasure"? No mention of the existence of the National
Archives-ratified Littlewood Treaty, which will single-handedly eliminate the
Treaty grievance industry once enough people know of its content? Clearly, the
truth was a negotiable commodity this night. What a great shame. All we really
learnt was that the "State of the Nation" is simply two entrenched
and divided rac aty of Waitangi - something I thought that we already knew.
Thanks for nothing. Yours faithfully Dylan Tipene - Auckland NZ. With the exception
of audience members, Allan Duff or Lila Smith, who both tried to say something "Real",
but were immediately shouted down in the process, most others in the audience
never even came close to representing the "average kiwi", let
alone expounding what people really felt or wanted to say. And so, Anthony,
What the media won't provide, New Zealanders have to provide for themselves in
websites like this one... or: www.treatyofwaitangi.net.nz We have many huge
archaeological mysteries in our region, in need of an explanation, which our scholars
are, quite deliberately, turning a blind eye to and not addressing. DOC representatives
are aware of the evidence, as they recently admitted to Journalist Leighton Keith of the
Advocate: 'Northland Conservation Board chairman, Lew Ritchie said most
board members were already aware this evidence existed, but the board was too
busy to investigate further'. I personally know of several archaeologists
who will admit to the same knowledge behind closed doors, but not in public.
I get a lot of very nice, supportive letters like
yours Anthony, but have a "wicked" tendency to show the highly
critical or accusative ones, as they're more fun or a challenge to deal with.
Please know that people writing in are, mostly, down to earth, humane, honest
and open individuals like yourself, yearning for the truth and very aware that
our "politically aligned" experts are withholding significant parts
of it from us. Regarding the plight of "white" people in South
Africa...15,000 have been murdered in recent times and it appears there will be
mass genocide very soon, but still our New Zealand media will say nothing. Zimbabwe's
"ethnic cleansing" programme proceeds on track without
interference or anything other than "token" protest from the world's
governments. Here's a quote from the Jeff Rense website in the United States:
Ms Allan warned that the 4.5 million Afrikaners are
being 'ethnically-cleansed' by the Mbeki regime and that their plight was
growing increasingly desperate each week. "More than 15,000 white South Africans
have already been slaughtered just since the start of the current American war
in Iraq," she pointed out. "That's more than twice as many as the
number of Iraqi civilians officially said to have been killed in the war so
far." She warned that SA President Mbeki has "a total
obsession with race," that he hates Afrikaner people and that he's obsessed
with what he terms "colonial oppression." Ms Allan pointed
out, however, that the Afrikaners aren't colonials -- they are indigenous to
South Africa, having been there some 350 years - three and a half CENTURIES -
and that they are "totally trapped on the continent of Africa, and have no
means of escaping" without the help of America.
God help them...as the governments of the world won't and have delivered them
up for slaughter...where's that local visionary for a perfect world, John Minto, now?
Best wishes, Martin.